IMPLANT GUIDE · MENTOR

Mentor Implants — A Practical Guide for International Patients

Medically reviewed by Dr. Junghyun Nam, board-certified plastic surgeon, Umnagumo Plastic Surgery

Mentor (a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary) is one of the two implants with the longest continuous FDA-approval history in the United States, and one of the most widely-used implants worldwide. It is a frequent choice in Korean breast surgery, often selected when historical depth and the longest-running clinical evidence outweigh newer-generation properties.

01

MemoryGel — the cohesivity sweet spot

MemoryGel is the cohesive silicone gel inside Mentor's smooth and Siltex implants. It is engineered to hold its shape under shear (less risk of gel migration in the event of shell compromise) while remaining soft enough to feel natural under the patient's own breast tissue.

MemoryGel BOOST is the higher-cohesivity variant — used when more upper-pole projection and structural shape is desired (often in thinner patients or in revision cases where additional shape control is needed). The choice between standard MemoryGel and BOOST is anatomy-driven, not preference-driven.

02

Smooth vs. Siltex vs. Xtra Smooth

Mentor offers three surface profiles: Smooth (classic), Siltex (lightly textured), and Xtra Smooth (newer-generation, optimized smooth surface). The choice has practical consequences:

  • Smooth / Xtra Smooth — lower BIA-ALCL signal, can rotate (no concern for round implants, relevant for anatomicals), softer feel.
  • Siltex — moderate texturing, reduced rotation in anatomical implants, slightly different capsular-tissue interaction over time.
03

CPG anatomical line

Mentor's CPG (Contour Profile Gel) anatomical implants offer teardrop shape variants for patients where round implants would not match the desired silhouette. The trade-off is rotation risk: an anatomical implant that rotates produces an immediately abnormal-looking breast. Siltex texturing reduces but does not eliminate rotation; precise pocket dissection is essential.

In the average primary augmentation, Mentor's round MemoryGel is the more common choice; CPG anatomicals come into play in specific revision and reconstruction cases.

04

FDA approval depth — why it matters in patient choice

Mentor was one of the original FDA-approved silicone gel implants in 2006 after the 14-year moratorium ended. It has continuous post-approval study data spanning two decades on the same family of products. For patients who weight longest-running evidence heavily in their decision, this depth of dataset is unmatched.

Newer-generation implants (Motiva, Sebbin) have shorter records by definition — they may turn out to be equally good or better in 10 years, but the public data does not yet cover that horizon. Mentor's track record covers it.

05

When Mentor is the right choice

Mentor is typically the right answer for:

  • Patients who weight historical depth and FDA-approval evidence heavily in their implant decision.
  • Patients who want a well-characterized soft round implant in a moderate-volume primary augmentation.
  • Revision cases where the surgeon and patient want a known long-term complication profile, not a newer-generation unknown.
  • Patients comfortable with the conventional smooth-implant generation rather than the newer nano-textured class.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mentor a good breast implant?

Mentor is one of the two implants with the longest continuous FDA-approval history in the United States, with post-approval study data spanning two decades on the same product family. It is a frequent choice when historical depth and the longest-running clinical evidence outweigh newer-generation properties — the right choice depends on the patient, not the brochure.

Which implant is better — Mentor or Motiva?

There is no single best implant. Mentor offers the longest FDA-approval history and the deepest long-term clinical dataset; Motiva offers newer-generation properties such as nanotexturing and a softer gel behaviour, but its public data covers a shorter horizon by definition. The right answer comes out of the consultation and the patient's own anatomy and priorities.

What is MemoryGel BOOST?

MemoryGel BOOST is the higher-cohesivity variant of Mentor's cohesive silicone gel — used when more upper-pole projection and structural shape is desired, often in thinner patients or in revision cases needing additional shape control. The choice between standard MemoryGel and BOOST is anatomy-driven, not preference-driven.

What is the difference between Mentor Smooth, Siltex, and Xtra Smooth?

Smooth and Xtra Smooth surfaces carry a lower BIA-ALCL signal and a softer feel but can rotate (relevant only for anatomical shapes); Siltex is lightly textured, reducing rotation in anatomical implants with a slightly different capsular-tissue interaction over time. Xtra Smooth is the newer-generation optimized smooth surface.

Why does Mentor's FDA-approval history matter?

Mentor was one of the original FDA-approved silicone gel implants in 2006 after the 14-year moratorium ended, and it has continuous post-approval study data spanning two decades on the same family of products. For patients who weight longest-running evidence heavily, that depth of dataset is the deciding factor.

There is no single best implant. Mentor is the right choice when the patient values the longest available evidence base and when their anatomy matches what Mentor does well. Motiva and Sebbin earn their place in different cases. The choice belongs to the consultation, not the brochure.

Related guides


Motiva & Mentor Implant Size Charts (Official Dimensions)

An implant is selected by matching its base diameter to your chest and breast width and soft-tissue thickness — not by volume (cc) alone. The charts below list each product line's officially published dimensions so you can see how base width, projection, and volume relate. All figures are the manufacturers' own specifications, published in centimetres (cm; 1 cm = 10 mm). They are physical product facts, not a comparison or recommendation of any brand; individual dimensions may vary slightly, and the appropriate choice depends on tissue assessment in consultation.

Base diameter and projection, illustrated with three Motiva profiles at the same baseThree simplified side-profile diagrams with base diameter and projection plotted at the same scale, all with a 12.5 cm base diameter. Mini projects 3.0 cm and holds 310 cc, Demi projects 4.1 cm and holds 380 cc, Full projects 5.1 cm and holds 450 cc. The base diameter is identical; only projection and volume change.3.0 cmbase ⌀ 12.5 cmMini3.0 cm projection · 310 cc4.1 cmbase ⌀ 12.5 cmDemi4.1 cm projection · 380 cc5.1 cmbase ⌀ 12.5 cmFull5.1 cm projection · 450 ccSame base diameter, three projectionsAt this fixed 12.5 cm base diameter, higher projection corresponds to greaterlisted volume; the implant width stays the same.
Original simplified schematic; base diameter and projection are plotted at a common scale (12.5 cm base; 3.0 / 4.1 / 5.1 cm projections). The curved outlines are illustrative, not literal implant contours or predicted breast shapes. Values are from the Mini/Demi/Full rows in Motiva's U.S. physician labeling, reproduced in the table below — not manufacturer artwork. It shows what the two numbers in every cell mean: base diameter is the width the implant occupies across the chest, and projection is how far it stands out. Three implants can share one base diameter and still differ in volume, which is why size is discussed as a diameter-plus-projection pair rather than as cc alone.

These tables show selected manufacturer-published sizes, not the complete available ranges.

Motiva Ergonomix® / Round (SmoothSilk® / SilkSurface®)

Ergonomix and Round share the same base–projection–volume matrix (gel behaviour and arc length differ). Four projection profiles: Mini, Demi, Full, Corsé (low → high projection).

Each cell = projection (cm) / volume (cc), by base diameter and profile.

Base ⌀ (cm)MiniDemiFullCorsé †
10.02.5 / 1603.5 / 2054.1 / 2354.8 / 280
11.52.8 / 2453.9 / 3004.7 / 3555.7 / 440
12.53.0 / 3104.1 / 3805.1 / 4506.3 / 590
14.03.3 / 4304.5 / 5255.7 / 6257.2 / 825
15.0 †3.5 / 5254.8 / 6256.1 / 7757.8 / 1050

Source: Motiva USA Directions for Use (IFU) DOC-001045 Rev.3, 09/2024 (Mini/Demi/Full); Establishment Labs international catalogue EN SCM-107, 2019 (Corsé and volumes beyond the US range).

Mentor MemoryGel® Smooth (round)

Four profiles: Moderate Classic, Moderate Plus, High, Ultra High. Full catalogued ranges: Moderate Classic 130–800 cc · Moderate Plus 100–800 cc · High 125–800 cc · Ultra High 135–800 cc.

Each cell = diameter (cm) / projection (cm), by volume. A cc in parentheses is the nearest catalogued volume for that profile.

Volume (cc)Mod. ClassicMod. PlusHighUltra High
15010.3 / 2.59.5 / 2.98.8 / 3.7
20010.5 / 3.29.7 / 4.08.4 / 4.4 (185)
25012.2 / 2.9 (255)11.3 / 3.410.5 / 4.39.0 / 4.7 (240)
30012.8 / 3.112.0 / 3.611.1 / 4.59.7 / 5.0 (295)
35013.4 / 3.2 (340)12.5 / 3.911.7 / 4.810.1 / 5.2
40014.2 / 3.4 (405)13.1 / 4.012.2 / 5.010.6 / 5.4
45014.8 / 3.5 (445)13.6 / 4.2 (450)12.8 / 5.1 (450)11.2 / 5.7 (455)

Source: J&J MedTech (Mentor) official product page, cross-verified against Mentor US 2020 catalogue and EMEA 2023 product guide (3-way match).

Mentor MemoryGel® Xtra

Higher fill than Smooth at the same base. Three profiles: Moderate Plus, Moderate High ‡, High. Full catalogued ranges: Moderate Plus 115–755 cc · Moderate High 130–775 cc · High 150–790 cc.

Each cell = diameter (cm) / projection (cm), by volume. A cc in parentheses is the nearest catalogued volume for that profile.

Volume (cc)Mod. PlusMod. High ‡High
1509.5 / 3.3 (160)8.8 / 3.78.3 / 4.1
20010.4 / 3.6 (215)9.8 / 4.1 (210)9.2 / 4.5
25010.8 / 3.7 (240)10.5 / 4.3 (255)9.9 / 5.0 (260)
30011.5 / 4.0 (295)11.1 / 4.6 (310)10.3 / 5.0 (285)
35012.3 / 4.111.6 / 4.811.0 / 5.5 (355)
40012.7 / 4.4 (405)12.1 / 4.911.5 / 5.8 (415)
45013.3 / 4.7 (465)12.5 / 5.1 (430)11.9 / 5.9 (450)

Source: J&J MedTech (Mentor) official product page; Moderate Plus and High also cross-verified against the 2020 and 2023 catalogues. ‡ The Moderate High profile appears only on the current J&J live page (single official source).

Mentor MemoryGel® Boost ‡

Introduced 2022. Three profiles: Moderate Plus, Moderate High, High. Full catalogued ranges: Moderate Plus 130–730 cc · Moderate High 150–775 cc · High 200–775 cc.

Each cell = diameter (cm) / projection (cm), by volume. A cc in parentheses is the exact catalogued volume for that profile.

Volume (cc)Mod. PlusMod. HighHigh
150–1609.3 / 3.3 (160)8.8 / 3.7 (150)
200–21010.3 / 3.5 (210)9.8 / 4.2 (210)9.0 / 4.4 (200)
260–26511.2 / 3.6 (265)10.5 / 4.3 (260)9.8 / 4.8 (260)
320–33011.6 / 4.1 (320)11.3 / 4.7 (330)10.5 / 5.3 (325)
390–40512.7 / 4.1 (390)12.1 / 5.0 (400)11.2 / 5.6 (405)
450–47013.2 / 4.5 (450)12.8 / 5.2 (470)11.6 / 5.8 (440)
530–54514.1 / 4.8 (545)13.5 / 5.5 (545)12.5 / 6.1 (545)

Source: J&J MedTech (Mentor) official MemoryGel Boost product page. ‡ Launched 2022; not in the 2020/2023 PDF catalogues, so the live manufacturer page is the single official source.

Why diameter, not just volume. Within the same product family, Motiva's U.S. labelling identified higher-projection profiles (Corsé or Full) as a risk factor associated with higher reoperation and explantation rates than lower-projection profiles (Demi or Mini). This is an observed association within one product family — not a comparison between brands and not a prediction of an individual result.

† The U.S.-cleared Motiva range is limited to Mini, Demi and Full profiles, base diameters 9.0–14.5 cm, and volumes 150–625 cc. Corsé, the entire 15.0 cm base-diameter row shown here, and all other sizes outside those limits are from Establishment Labs' 2019 international catalogue and are not FDA-approved in the United States. ‡ Mentor Xtra Moderate High and the entire MemoryGel Boost line are published on the current manufacturer web pages but not in the 2020/2023 PDF catalogues, so those figures rest on a single official source. These charts reproduce numeric specifications only; no catalogue images or artwork are reproduced. The data do not rank products, imply any implant is superior, or predict or guarantee an individual result.