Augmentation Case
Augmentation
- Category
- Augmentation

* Photographs shown are cases performed at our clinic. Results vary by individual and are not guaranteed.
Chief Complaint
Pre-operatively the patient was 75A, with difficulty forming cleavage and volume deficiency as concerns. She presented seeking a size increase.
Procedure
Implant augmentation. Size was selected after consultation, suited to body type. Individualized massage guidance was provided post-operatively.
Post-operative Course
Dr. Junghyun Nam (Director) and the consultation staff adjusted the plan while addressing questions raised by the patient.
Post-operatively the patient wore 75D. Compared with pre-op, changes in size and cleavage formation were observed.
Editorial Notes & Clinical Disclaimer
- Editorial Source
- Cases shown are clinical references compiled from chart records and intra-operative documentation, not first-person patient testimonials.
- Individual Variation
- Surgical results may vary individually. Procedure choice, implant type, sizing, and incision method are individualized to each patient's anatomy and clinical context.
- Case Specificity
- Photographs, technique, and recovery-timeline details represent the specific case shown and are not predictive of outcomes for other patients.
- Recovery Timeline
- Reported post-operative milestones (e.g. swelling reduction, sensory recovery, contour stabilization) are case-specific. Generalized recovery durations should not be inferred.
- Risks
- All surgical procedures carry risks, which may include bleeding/hematoma, infection, capsular contracture, asymmetry, sensory change (transient hypersensitivity or numbness), implant rupture/rotation/malposition, scarring, and the possibility of revision surgery.
- Consultation
- For consultation regarding individualized risks and procedure options, please contact our English-language desk via KakaoTalk: http://pf.kakao.com/_QRNzxj. We strongly recommend consultation with a board-certified plastic surgeon prior to any decision.
* Case photographs reflect individual variation and do not guarantee outcomes. All information herein is provided for editorial reference and does not constitute medical advice.
Discuss your procedure with ustalk to our surgeons directly.
Related CasesOther cases
Case No. 015Augmentation · Motiva 525/475cc
The patient had deficient breast volume and low breast adipose tissue, and sought reliable volume gain within the feasible range.
Case No. 017Augmentation
The patient had concerns about the recovery process and post-operative inconvenience, and presented seeking breast augmentation.
Case No. 014Augmentation · Motiva 265/285cc
The breasts were small, with concerns about both volume and contour. The patient sought a size increase and contour refinement.
Case No. 018Augmentation
Immediately post-operatively the patient had concerns about contour outcomes, and presented seeking breast augmentation.