Augmentation Case · 5 months post-op
Augmentation
- Category
- Augmentation
- Post-operative Course
- 5 months post-op



* Photographs shown are cases performed at our clinic. Results vary by individual and are not guaranteed.
Chief Complaint
Immediately post-operatively the patient had concerns about contour outcomes, and presented seeking breast augmentation.
Procedure
Implant augmentation. Co-surgery by the Representative Director and Dr. Junghyun Nam (Director).
Post-operative Course
From the consultation stage, the procedure and design plan were explained, and surgery was performed.
Photographs shown are at 3 months post-op. By 5 months post-op, contour had integrated naturally over time and stabilized.
Editorial Notes & Clinical Disclaimer
- Editorial Source
- Cases shown are clinical references compiled from chart records and intra-operative documentation, not first-person patient testimonials.
- Individual Variation
- Surgical results may vary individually. Procedure choice, implant type, sizing, and incision method are individualized to each patient's anatomy and clinical context.
- Case Specificity
- Photographs, technique, and recovery-timeline details represent the specific case shown and are not predictive of outcomes for other patients.
- Recovery Timeline
- Reported post-operative milestones (e.g. swelling reduction, sensory recovery, contour stabilization) are case-specific. Generalized recovery durations should not be inferred.
- Risks
- All surgical procedures carry risks, which may include bleeding/hematoma, infection, capsular contracture, asymmetry, sensory change (transient hypersensitivity or numbness), implant rupture/rotation/malposition, scarring, and the possibility of revision surgery.
- Consultation
- For consultation regarding individualized risks and procedure options, please contact our English-language desk via KakaoTalk: http://pf.kakao.com/_QRNzxj. We strongly recommend consultation with a board-certified plastic surgeon prior to any decision.
* Case photographs reflect individual variation and do not guarantee outcomes. All information herein is provided for editorial reference and does not constitute medical advice.
Discuss your procedure with ustalk to our surgeons directly.
Related CasesOther cases
Case No. 017Augmentation
The patient had concerns about the recovery process and post-operative inconvenience, and presented seeking breast augmentation.
Case No. 019Revision · Motiva 245/230cc
The patient had long-standing concerns over small breast size. She had a history of augmentation at another clinic in her late twenties, with implant removal at 2 weeks due to oversizing for her body frame. She sought re-augmentation at a size suited to her body type.
Case No. 016Augmentation
Pre-operatively the patient was 75A, with difficulty forming cleavage and volume deficiency as concerns. She presented seeking a size increase.
Case No. 020Augmentation · Motiva
The patient had deficient breast volume, with silhouette under clothing as a concern, and presented seeking a size increase.