Augmentation Case 6
Augmentation
- Category
- Augmentation
Photographs after surgery are available to members
Sign in to view the post-operative photographs and the full clinical account for this case.
Sign in to viewSign in with Kakao, Naver, or Google. The sign-in screen is in Korean. We do not collect your phone number.
* Photographs shown are cases performed at our clinic. Results vary by individual and are not guaranteed.
Chief Complaint
The patient sought a fuller breast volume and presented after comparative consultations at multiple clinics.
Procedure
Implant augmentation. A size harmonized with body type was planned from the design stage, and surgery was performed under a co-surgeon arrangement led by the Director.
Post-operative Course
Dr. Junghyun Nam (Director) led the consultation, explaining design and procedure. Post-operative precautions were re-confirmed by nursing staff.
Tightness was observed for about 2 weeks; upper-limb elevation became feasible by approximately 1 month. Compression and V-fit brassieres were used in combination for ongoing post-operative management.
Editorial Notes & Clinical Disclaimer
- Editorial Source
- Cases shown are clinical references compiled from chart records and intra-operative documentation, not first-person patient testimonials.
- Individual Variation
- Surgical results may vary individually. Procedure choice, implant type, sizing, and incision method are individualized to each patient's anatomy and clinical context.
- Case Specificity
- Photographs, technique, and recovery-timeline details represent the specific case shown and are not predictive of outcomes for other patients.
- Recovery Timeline
- Reported post-operative milestones (e.g. swelling reduction, sensory recovery, contour stabilization) are case-specific. Generalized recovery durations should not be inferred.
- Risks
- All surgical procedures carry risks, which may include bleeding/hematoma, infection, capsular contracture, asymmetry, sensory change (transient hypersensitivity or numbness), implant rupture/rotation/malposition, scarring, and the possibility of revision surgery.
- Consultation
- For consultation regarding individualized risks and procedure options, please contact us via WhatsApp: https://wa.me/821031165545. We strongly recommend consultation with a board-certified plastic surgeon prior to any decision.
* Case photographs reflect individual variation and do not guarantee outcomes. All information herein is provided for editorial reference and does not constitute medical advice.
Discuss your procedure with ustalk to our surgeons directly.
Related CasesOther cases
- Case No. 005
Augmentation · Motiva
The breasts appeared small relative to body frame, and a large thoracic cage further accentuated the small appearance. The patient sought a size increase.
- Case No. 007
Augmentation
The breasts were small, with the smallest available undergarment size, and volume deficiency was the chief complaint. The patient sought a size increase.
- Case No. 004
Augmentation · Motiva 360cc
The patient had concerns about post-operative outcomes such as capsular contracture and sensory change, and presented seeking improvement of breast contour.
- Case No. 008
Augmentation · Motiva 340/320cc
Thoracic circumference 70, breast width 14, with thin skin. The patient sought a size increase, targeting approximately a full B-cup.
